Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2011No. Docket No. 300641PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In his delayed application for leave to appeal, defendant raises two alleged errors on the part *35of the trial court relative to the denial of his motion to dismiss. First, he argues that the trial court erred in requiring him to produce expert testimony in support of his defense to the charges, and second, that he should not have been precluded from raising his statutory defense at trial even though the trial court rejected the defense as factually unsupported after a pretrial evidentiary hearing. As set forth below, we agree with, and therefore adopt as a unanimous opinion of this Court,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Paramount Pictures Corp. v. MiskinisMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Kolanek; People v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. DantoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. McQueenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Wilcoxon v. City of Detroit Election CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API