Hill v. Richardson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson
The plaintiff, Lloyd Hill, as administrator of the estate of Karl Fugiel, deceased, asks this court to reverse a judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the defendants, Richardson and Cummings, as receivers of the Chicago. Railways Company, a corporation, and others.
The action in the trial court was one for the death of Karl Fugiel, arising out of personal injuries alleged to have been caused by reason of the negligent operation of a street car at the intersection of Avenue “0” and 118th street in the City of Chicago.
After the evidence had been submitted to a jury and after a motion for a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Thomas v. BuchananIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. VoelkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Nonn v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Duffy v. CortesiIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Denny v. Goldblatt Bros.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Mulhern v. Public Auto Parks, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- Valentine v. EnglandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Wickstrom v. Ringling Bros.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.