Legal Opinion

CONSOL. GRAIN & BARGE CO. v. Wisconsin Barge Line

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided August 31, 1981No. 79-1059 A(3)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

522 F.Supp. 842 (1981)

CONSOLIDATED GRAIN AND BARGE COMPANY, Plaintiff,

v.

WISCONSIN BARGE LINE, INC., Defendant.

MARINE EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Intervenor,

v.

CONSOLIDATED GRAIN AND BARGE COMPANY and Wisconsin Barge Line, Inc., Defendants.

No. 79-1059 A(3).

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

June 26, 1981.

Memorandum and Order August 31, 1981.

Gary T. Sacks, Goldstein & Price, Robert Nienhuis, St. Louis, Mo., for Consolidated Grain & Barge Co.

Joseph Murphy, Lucas & Murphy, Donald Balfour, St. Louis, Mo., for Marine Equipment Management Corp.

Michael D. O'Keefe, Thompson &…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. The Steamer WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Cargill, Incorporated v. Taylor Towing Service, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Mid-America Transportation Company, Inc. v. National Marine Service, Inc., and M/v National Progress, Her Engines,boilers, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Folkstone Maritime, Ltd. v. CSX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re American Milling Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
  3. SCNO Barge Lines, Inc. v. Sun Transp. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
  4. Makin v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas ArgentinasDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
  5. Folkstone Maritime, Limited v. Csx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API