Legal Opinion

Fink v. Fink

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 22, 2016No. 2016-CA-000797-MRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER1

VANMETER, JUDGE:

On September 15, 2016, this Court directed James Michael Fink, the appellant, to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failing to name an indispensable party to this appeal. On September 30, 2016, James filed a document titled “Appellant’s Motion to Amend Notice of Appeal and Response to the September 15, 2016 Show Cause Order,” and tendered an Amended Notice of Appeal. Elizabeth Fink, the appellee, did not respond to the show cause order.

On April 27, 2016, the Jefferson Circuit Court entered an Order, which stated: “Thus, the Court orders…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Devondale v. StallingsKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Neidlinger v. NeidlingerKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Nelson County Board of Education v. ForteKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Louisville Label, Inc. v. HildesheimKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Braden c. Republic-Vanguard Life Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charles F. Mahl v. Louanne MahlKentucky Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Louanne Mahl v. Charles F. MahlKentucky Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API