Legal Opinion
People v. Nguyen
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 2005No. G033973PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
Tutram Hai Nguyen was convicted of transporting and possessing for sale methamphetamine and marijuana. Nguyen contends she asserted her right to counsel under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602] and its progeny when she attempted to call her attorney during her arrest. Consequently, she asserts police violated her right to an attorney when they later approached her at the station house, obtained her Miranda waiver, and interrogated her about the crime. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I
On the evening of May 31, 2003, Buena Park…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ApplebySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. HamblyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. SCHUNINGAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- People v. BuskirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Mattos CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.