Legal Opinion
United States v. Singh
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 13, 2007No. 06-2886, 06-3056PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants David Ruiz Singh (“David”) and Martin Ruiz Singh (“Martin”) were convicted by a jury of distributing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiring to distribute in excess of 500 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Martin was also convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Both defendants argue that the district court permitted the introduction of inadmissible hearsay testimony over their objections and in violation of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Daniel Lewis Lee, Also Known as Daniel Lewis Graham, Also Known as D L Graham, Also Known as Danny LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. David Joseph MickelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Spotted ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Avila VargasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Gerald Wayne LeBeauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Walker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.