Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Seattle Electric Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1908No. 6921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered March 7, 1907, after a hearing on the merits, vacating an assessment made by commissioners appointed to levy an assessment upon property specially benefited by a municipal improvement.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The city of Seattle, pursuant to powers conferred on it by its charter and by the general laws, caused all that portion of Westlake avenue lying between Denny way and Mercer street to be widened and otherwise improved. The respondent, Seattle Electric Company, owns and operates an electric railway on certain streets of the city of Seattle, among which is Westlake avenue, under a franchise granted by the city to J. D. Lowman and Jacob Furth, of whom it is the successor in interest. The track on the improved part of Westlake avenue extends in both directions beyond such part, and such track is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Westlake AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Severns Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  3. In re Third, Fourth & Fifth Avenues, SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Motoramp Garage Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Simons v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API