Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Reese

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1987No. 247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Lemuel Reese has filed an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed for operating a motor vehicle while his driving privileges were under suspension. The substantive evidence of guilt is great, and Reese has not challenged its sufficiency. He contends, rather, that his conviction is procedurally defective.

On November 4, 1983, Reese was arrested and charged with driving while his operating privileges were under suspension. The charge was dismissed on procedural grounds by a district justice in Centre County because he believed that the arresting officer had violated Pa.R.Crim.P.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. COOKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. CruzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. FischlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. McGinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. AshCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Com. v. Reives, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API