Legal Opinion
37712, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Liquor Control and Michael A. Akrouche
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1997No. 96-3273PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant 37712, Inc., an Ohio corporation (“the plaintiff”), has challenged the constitutionality of Ohio statutes which permit “local option” elections in a political subdivision of a county (namely an election precinct or a residence district) 1 whereby the local voters (in this instance the voters in a city election precinct within the City of Eastlake), via initiative and referendum, may forbid certain sales of alcoholic beverages 2 otherwise authorized by licenses issued by defendant-appellee the Ohio Department of Liquor Control (“ODLC”). The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Trihealth, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, Hamilton County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Wine & Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- John Ross v. Michael DugganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Fednav, Ltd. v. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.