Legal Opinion

Alandt v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 2018No. CR-18-244PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

For his sole point of appeal, Alandt contends the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to modify the November 20, 2017 amended sentencing order to reflect that he could later petition to seal his record. The second amended sentencing order was filed after Alandt filed his brief and before the State filed its brief. In its brief, the State contends that the entry of the second amended nunc pro tunc sentencing order on June 21, 2018, rendered this appeal moot because it provided that Alandt could later petition to have his record sealed. We agree.

As a general rule, our appellate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Matlock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnathan Pinney v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API