Legal Opinion

State v. O'BRIEN

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1985No. C5-84-973Published

1Opinion of the Court

364 N.W.2d 901 (1985)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Richard Neal O'BRIEN, Appellant.

No. C5-84-973.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 2, 1985.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., James B. Early, St. Paul, Michael Milligan, Cass Co. Atty., Walker, for respondent.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, Heidi Crissey, Asst. State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by the court en banc, consisting of POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER, HUSPENI, LESLIE, NIERENGARTEN, RANDALL and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant Richard O'Brien was convicted of criminal sexual…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence · Popovich; Concurrence · Huspeni.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. LaTourelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API