Legal Opinion

State v. D.R.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 2011No. 3D10-2479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.

The State of Florida appeals from an order granting D.R.’s motion to suppress. We reverse and remand for a new suppression hearing.

In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, the appellate courts defer to the trial court’s factual findings so long as the findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence, and review de novo the legal question of whether there was probable cause given the totality of the factual circumstances. Twilegar v. State, 42 So.3d 177, 192 (Fla.2010). Having reviewed the evidence presented at the hearing on D.R.’s motion to suppress, we conclude…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Twilegar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. Cresswell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. State v. BetzSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JenkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API