Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. McNulty

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1950No. Nos. 28,567, 28,569 and 28,571 to 28,585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

These seventeen appeals were consolidated by this court for briefing. Each of the indictments was returned by the grand jury of Marion County charging appellees with making and drawing a lottery scheme and gift enterprise in violation of § 10-2302, Burns’ 1942 Replacement, Acts 1905, ch. 169, § 555, p. 584. This section of our statute reads as follows:

“Whoever sells a lottery ticket or tickets, or a share or shares in any lottery scheme or gift enterprise, or acts as agent for any lottery scheme or gift enterprise, or aids or abets any person or persons to engage in the same, or transmits…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hudelson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Freleigh v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
  3. Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Trout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. State v. BoveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Siebeking v. Ford, Admx., Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Wasy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Siebeking v. Ford, Admx., Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API