Legal Opinion

Meadowbrook Health Care Services of Florida, Inc. v. Acosta

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 4, 1993No. Nos. 93-422, 93-562Published

1Per curiam

The court’s sanction of striking the defendant’s pleadings and entering a default judgment on liability is reversed as clearly excessive and disproportionate to Meadowbrook’s act of failing to comply with a discovery order while a motion for rehearing concerning the propriety of that order was still pending in this court. Wainscott v. Rindley, 610 So.2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); J.E.I. Airlines, Inc. v. Britton, Cassel, Schantz & Schatzman, P.A., 605 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Meadowbrook’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari to review the court’s order permitting financial discovery is denied.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wainscott v. RindleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. J.E.I. Airlines, Inc. v. Britton, Cassel, Schantz & Schatzman, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API