Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Arroyo

California Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2016No. S219178Published

1Concurrence

LIU, J.,

Concurring.—I agree with today’s opinion that Welfare and Institutions Code section 707, subdivision (d)(4) does not require prosecution by way of a preliminary hearing before a magistrate in discretionarily filed cases under section 707, subdivision (d)(2). I also agree that because “ ‘the grand jury serves as the functional equivalent of a magistrate who presides over a preliminary examination on a felony complaint’ ” (Guillory v. Superior Court (2003) 31 Cal.4th 168, 174 [1 Cal.Rptr.3d 879, 72 P.3d 815]), the grand jury must make a finding “that reasonable cause exists to believe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Guillory v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API