In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Litigation; Graham v. Philips, et al.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, ) BI-LEVEL PAP, AND MECHANICAL ) VENTILATOR PRODUCTS ) Master Docket: Misc. No. 21-1230 LITIGATION ) ) ) MDL No. 3014 This Document Relates to: ) ) Graham v. Philips, et al., #22-224 ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction The Graham case, Civ. No. 22-224, was filed in a Kentucky state court and names Gould’s Discount Medical, LLC (“Gould’s”), a durable medical equipment (“DME”) middleman, as one of the defendants. Defendants Philips RS North America LLC, Koninklijke Philips N.V.,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.