Legal Opinion
Rochlin v. Alamo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 14, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In two related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) Mindy Rochlin, the plaintiff in Action No. 1, appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated June 15, 1992, as, upon a trial ruling granting the motion of Bernard A. Karron, the defendant in Action No. 1 and the plaintiff in Action No. 2, for a dismissal of the complaint in Action No. 1 insofar as asserted against him, dismissed the complaint in Action No. 1 insofar as it is asserted against him, and, upon a trial ruling granting the motion of the defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Haddock v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- O'Boyle v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Detone v. Bullit Courier Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Dunn v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cruz v. New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Cardona v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Sato v. CorreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Resource Financing, Inc. v. National Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Drumm v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999