Legal Opinion · Dissent

Victoria Distributors, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 28, 1966No. C.D. 2639Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Foed, Judge:

The air pumps involved herein operate substantially in the same manner as the pumps involved in United Merchandising Corp. and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 396, Abstract 63100, wherein said pumps were held 'by this court not to be machines. While the majority opinions hold the instant pumps to be machines, the reasoning supporting their decisions differ.

I am in agreement with my colleagues that there has been no judicial determination of what constitutes a machine and that the common meaning of the term is what governs. I concur with my…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Systems Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. United Merchandising Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API