Southard v. Morris
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence a motion is interposed by defendant to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant.
This action is brought against the defendant for alleged slander claimed to have been spoken by the defendant of and concerning the plaintiff.
There are three utterances charged against the defendant.
First, it is claimed that defendant spoke the' following slanderous words:
“He (referring to plaintiff) wrote the word ‘horseshoer’ in Exhibit A, himself, after this action (referring to Southard Novelty Co. v. Paul, Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Ohio) was begun and by so…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hastings v. LuskCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Kleiber v. People's Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Atlanta News Publishing Co. v. MedlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Maulsby v. ReifsniderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Howland v. George F. Blake Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.