Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Hiatt
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1893No. 5224PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error from the district court of Gage county. Tried below before Broady, J. Holmes v. Boydston, 1 Neb., 346; French v. Ramge, 2: Neb., 254; Sycamore Co. v. Sturm, 13 Neb., 215; Bridges v. Lanham, 14 Neb., 369; Denver, T. & G. R. Co. v. Hutchins, 31 Neb., 572.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, C. J.
This is an action for a breach of the following agreement:
“ This agreement, entered into this 22d day of August,. 1889, by and between Lind Nelson and C. J. Hiatt, witnesseth: That the said Lind Nelson, for and in consideration of the covenants to be performed by C. J. Hiatt, do-promise and agree not to buy hogs or cattle to ship from this place of Odell, Gage county, Nebraska, except said Lind Nelson has a part of car load of cattle to ship, then said Nelson has the privilege to buy to fill said car and ship the same. This agreement to be in force so long as-*479C. J. Hiatt is in the business of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sheppard v. BoggsNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- Wallingford, Shamp & Co. v. BurrNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frank H. Gibson, Inc. v. OMAHA COFFEE COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- Rossing v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Iman v. InksterNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
- Fairchild v. Gray, New York County Courts1930
- C. F. Hovey Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.