Legal Opinion · Dissent

Linton v. Nawaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 2009Published

1Dissent

Catterson and McGuire, JJ.,

dissent in part in a memoran-

dum by McGuire, J., as follows: I agree with the majority that plaintiffs’ claim under the 90/180-day provision of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) must be dismissed. However, I would also dismiss the claims premised on injuries to plaintiff John R. Linton’s spine and left knee.

Plaintiffs allege that John Linton sustained injuries to his spine, left knee and right shoulder when he was struck by a vehicle driven by defendant Muhammad Nawaz and owned by defendant Chire Taxi, Inc. In support of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Thompson v. AbbasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Shinn v. CatanzaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Brown v. AchyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API