Legal Opinion

Freie v. No. 4 Fidelity Building & Savings Union

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ op Error to the Appellate Court for the Second District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Lake county; the Hon. Clark W. Upton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

Defendant in error filed its bill to foreclose a mortgage given to it by plaintiffs in error, J. Henry Freie and Caroline Freie, his wife. The bill alleged that said J. Henry Freie, one of complainant’s members and stockholders, borrowed from it $3000 on thirty-six shares of its stock, giving his note for said sum and securing it by the mortgage. The defendants by their answer admitted every material averment of fact, but set up as a defense that the note and mortgage were usurious, because they provided for a premium at seven per cent per annum and for fines, in addition to interest at six…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. PrattIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Holmes v. SmytheIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Floyd v. National Loan & Investment Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ElbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Bradbury v. Waukegan & Washington Mining & Smelting Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  4. National Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. BurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hedley v. GeisslerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API