Legal Opinion

M'Call v. Forsyth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1842PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ERROR to the District Court of Allegheny county. John Forsyth brought this action on the case against William M’Call, Abraham Horbach, Samuel Reisher, James Spratt and Samuel Elder, to recover damages for an injury done to him by the upsetting of the defendants’ stage.. M’Call and Horbach were alone served with process, and for them alone was there any appearance or plea.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the District Court of Allegheny county. John Forsyth brought this action on the case against William M’Call, Abraham Horbach, Samuel Reisher, James Spratt and Samuel Elder, to recover damages for an injury done to him by the upsetting of the defendants’ stage.. M’Call and Horbach were alone served with process, and for them alone was there any appearance or plea. The defendants took the ground that the plaintiff could not recover unless he proved that all the defendants sued were partners or part owners of the stage in which the plaintiff received the injury alleged in his…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Rogers, J.

— We affirm this judgment on the authority of the case of Brotherton and others, (7 Eng. Com. Law Rep. 343, 2 Brod. & Bing. 54); Ansell v. Waterhouse, (18 Eng. Com. Law Rep. 227, 2 Chitty 1); Bank of Orange v. Brown, (3 Wend. 158); to which may be added Zell v. Arnold, (2 Penn. Rep. 297). Chief Justice Savage, in The Bank of Orange v. Brown, (3 Wend. 158), reviews all tne authorities which bear on the question, and comes to the conclusion (in which we concur) that the true rule is, that an action solely on the custom is an action of tort;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of Orange v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Reeside's v. ReesideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  3. Cowan v. NagelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Anthony v. Louisville & N. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1886
  5. Howard v. American Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API