Legal Opinion · Dissent

Meise v. Doscher

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1895Published

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by Louise Meise against John H. Doscher and Henry Newman on a promissory note. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $2,036.77, directed by the court, defendants appeal.

1DissentO’Brien, J.

I dissent from the views of the majority of the court in this case. The plaintiff, in 1889, claimed an indebtedness against the defendant Doscher of $4,500, for which she held three promis-, sory notes for .$1,500 each, made by him and indorsed by the defendant Newman, which notes contained a statement, “with interest at five per cent, per annum.” In adjustment of such indebtedness, the defendant Doscher, in addition to cash, gave two notes of $1,500 each, one of which is the note in suit, and thereupon sur: rendered the notes that he then held. It is conceded that the two notes for $1,500,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGrath v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Farmers' National Bank v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API