People v. Garson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of thé evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe their demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. TexidorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. Hong WuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.