Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1998No. Nos. 96-16157, 96-16465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, District Judge:

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) appeals adverse rulings in its actions asserting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and gross negligence against the directors of a failed Arizona bank, Century Bank (“Ceintury” or the “Bank”), as well as spousal liability. It is the culmination of a sorry saga of alleged mismanagement by defendants, members of the Board of Directors of Century, a state-chartered, federally insured banking institution, at various times from the Bank’s opening in January 1981 through October 1989. During most of this time, from…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 47, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 93 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Richard A. Jackson, Wanda A. Jackson, Harry J. Cavanagh, Geri Cavanagh, Clifton B. Cox, Helen Cox, Joseph A. Dupont, Marilyn Dupont, James D. Fox, Geneva E. Fox, Louis S. Grubb, Evelyn F. Grubb, William M. Kipp, Gayle Kipp, Clyde B. Smith, Peggy J. Smith and John B. Stiteler, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API