Legal Opinion

Purinton v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided January 8, 1949No. Claim No. 28875Published

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

Claimants failed to file a claim or notice of intention within the time limited therefor by subdivision 3 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act. They now ask permission of this court to file a claim by a motion duly made under subdivision 5 of section 10 of the same act.

We shall only concern ourselves with the excuse offered for failure to comply with the prescribed statute.

These are the alleged facts: Claimants visited their property on December 10, 1947, and were informed by their tenant that a large shade tree growing between the farmhouse and the paved portion of the highway had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dufel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Schroeder v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Williams v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1941
  4. Guifre v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  5. Haney v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API