Legal Opinion
Dehority v. Whitcomb
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 1895No. 1,550PublishedCited by 5 opinions
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
The appellee, plaintiff below, recovered a judgment against the appellant for personal injuries sustained on account of the alleged negligence of appellant.
The first assignment of error calls in question the sufficiency of the complaint to withstand a demurrer for want of facts.
The complaint avers that in November, 1892, the defendant was engaged in the erection and construction of a two-story brick business block in the city of Elwood, the property of the defendant; that in the erection and construction of the building the defendant employed one E. R. Coxen, a contractor of said city, with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. FarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Ryan v. CurranIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- New Albany Forge & Rolling Mill v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Noblesville Gas & Improvement Co. v. TeterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Park v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Falender v. BlackwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Walbert v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. JudayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Bohrer v. Dienhart Harness Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898