prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,585 Catherine W. Griffin v. Medtronic, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge MOTZ joined.
OPINION
MICHAEL, Senior District Judge:
Catherine Griffin appeals the decision of the district court granting summary judgment to Medtronic, Inc. (“Medtronic”) on the grounds that Griffin’s claims are preempted by 21 U.S.C.A. § 360k (West Supp.1995), enacted as part of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (MDA) to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. On the recent authority of Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Co., 65 F.3d 392 (4th Cir.1995), we affirm in part, reverse in part…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Jennifer Stamps v. Collagen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Jane King v. Collagen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Fernando Rodriguez v. Sk & F Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- Catherine W. Griffin v. Medtronic, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Griffin v. MedtronicCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997