Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,585 Catherine W. Griffin v. Medtronic, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1996No. 94-1219PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge MOTZ joined.

OPINION

MICHAEL, Senior District Judge:

Catherine Griffin appeals the decision of the district court granting summary judgment to Medtronic, Inc. (“Medtronic”) on the grounds that Griffin’s claims are preempted by 21 U.S.C.A. § 360k (West Supp.1995), enacted as part of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (MDA) to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. On the recent authority of Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Co., 65 F.3d 392 (4th Cir.1995), we affirm in part, reverse in part…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  2. Jennifer Stamps v. Collagen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Jane King v. Collagen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Fernando Rodriguez v. Sk & F Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Catherine W. Griffin v. Medtronic, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. Griffin v. MedtronicCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API