Legal Opinion

Hazen v. Southern Hills National Bank

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1969No. 8843PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

In 1963, the Comptroller of the Currency for the United States appointed defendant-appellee Greenfield as the conservator of the Southern Hills National Bank. The conservator closed the bank and later its assets were transferred to a new bank, Southern Hills National Bank of Tulsa. Plaintiff-appellant Ha-zen was an organizer of the old bank and at all pertinent times a stockholder and director thereof. Plaintiff sued the conservator and the new bank, in an Oklahoma state court, to rescind the transfer and to recover damages. The defendants removed the case to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Greenberg v. GIANNINICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Charles E. LawrensonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  5. Sherman H. Skolnick v. Charles T. Martin, Arthur Lilly, and Charles R. PerrigoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gurda Farms, Inc. v. Monroe County Legal Assistance Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Morrow v. ToppingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. S. Paul Hazen v. Southern Hills National BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API