Jesus Maria Rancho v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, and from an order denying a new trial. Robert M. Clarke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
WORKS, J., pro tem.
This is an action for damages for the loss of cattle killed by the appellant’s railroad trains. The complaint sets up four causes of action. The first of these seeks to recover for the loss of twb cows on January 25, 1912; the second for the loss of four cows on September 6, 1912; the third for the loss of a cow and calf on April 2, 1913, and the fourth for loss of a yearling heifer on April 28, 1913. Judgment was rendered in favor of respondent on all of the causes of action, and the appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.
Wh…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Wills v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pluym v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921