State ex rel. Village of Linndale v. Masten
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The sole appellant herein, Armand Masten, Mayor of Linndale, raises two propositions of law for our review. First, the appellant proposes that, absent a showing of negligence or other wrongdoing, a public official should not be held liable for the loss of funds collected in his official capacity. The appellant urges that public officials be held to the same standard of care as private trustees, i.e., that they should be required to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence in the protection of funds under their control, and that they should not be held liable for the loss of public funds…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. OsborneOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HerbertOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Seward v. National Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sylvester Summers, Jr. Co., L.P.A. v. E. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Oriana House, Inc. v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Crooksville Exempted Village School District v. Curth (In Re Curth)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989