Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Williamson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 2005No. 98,234PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINCHESTER, V.C.J.

¶ 1 The dispositive issue presented for our review is whether the trial court erred when it denied the motion of Appellant, Robert A. Williamson, (hereinafter “father”), to modify the parties’ child custody and support agreement. Father and Appellee, Meryl E. Williamson, (hereinafter “mother”), previously reached an agreement as to child support calculations and property settlement that did not contemplate shared parenting. Father sought to add a provision for shared parenting pursuant to 43 O.S.2001, § 118(10) 2 , against mother’s objection 3 . The trial court, Hon. Barbara…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Boatsman v. BoatsmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of BTWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Marriage of Herrera v. HerreraCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. Marsh v. MarshCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Mullendore v. MullendoreCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  5. Barnes v. BarnesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API