Legal Opinion

Dayringer v. Mullen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1983No. WD 33667PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Leo M. and Delores I. Mullen, defendants below, were sued by respondent Dayringer for damages in a cause of action alleging malicious prosecution and abuse of process. A jury awarded Dayringer actual damages of $55,004.00 and assessed punitive damages of $200,000.00 each against Leo and Delores. An after trial order reduced the punitive damages against Delores to $25,000.00 and judgment was entered for Dayringer in the revised total of $280,004.00. The Mullens appeal.

Although litigation between these parties has continued for more than ten years, a brief review of that litigation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Bank of Thayer v. Klump Transfer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Godsy v. GodsyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Blythe v. BlytheMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brockhoff v. LearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Mullen v. RennerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Bank of Brookfield-Purdin, N.A. v. BurnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Clayton v. ClaytonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Abbadessa v. TindallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API