Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 31-89, (1989)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided October 11, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DARWIN L. ZWIEG, District Attorney Clark County

You ask two questions related to your duties under section778.12, Stats. One of your questions may be broadly restated as follows: What is the extent of a district attorney's obligation to prosecute town forfeiture actions at the request of a town chairman under section 778.12?

It is my opinion that, while a district attorney is statutorily required to exercise his or her discretion upon receipt of such a request in a manner that comports with the purpose of the statute, a district attorney retains limited prosecutorial discretion under section…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State ex rel. Gill v. Common Council of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Cross v. SoderbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No. Oag 24-90, (1990), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API