Legal Opinion

Harper v. Holman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was a suit in1 equity by Harper & Bros, against William A. Holman and others, trading as A. J. Holman & Co., for alleged infringement of complainants’ right in the name of a book, and also for an infringement of their copyrights. A demurrer to the bill was heretofore overruled. See 84 Fed. 222. The cause is now heard upon a motion for a preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs have moved for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the defendants — First, from continuing an alleged violation of copyright; and, second, from using, in connection with any book whatever, the name or designation “The Fram Expedition'-Nansen in the Frozen World.”

1. A preliminary injunction will not be awarded except in a plain case; and, upon careful consideration of the proofs as now presented, I cannot say that the infringement of copyright alleged has been so clearly established as to exclude substantial doubt upon that subject. It must not be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Estes v. WilliamsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
  3. Estes v. LeslieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
  4. Social Register Ass'n v. HowardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1894
  5. Estes v. WorthingtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harper v. LareU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API