Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 18, 1991No. 3-91-0034, 3-91-0035, 3-91-0063 consPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

These three consolidated cases present a common question: whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a continuance to the State. In each case the State declined to participate in further proceedings and a judgment of acquittal was entered for the defendant. We reverse and remand.

Although the legal issues presented by these cases are virtually identical, the factual circumstances are not. Therefore we will relate the relevant facts in the record in each case.

APPEAL No. 3-91-0034.

On September 5, 1990, defendant Billy Harris was charged by criminal complaint with battery…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. LawsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. DeemsIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. LottIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. VerstatAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. State v. StoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. People v. MartinezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. People v. MizaurAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. MartinezIllinois Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API