Martine v. Nelson
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence
This was a proceeding under the lien law, in which the complainant sought to recover the value of certain work performed by him upon a house of the defendant. The defendant answered under oath, which had not been waived by the complainant, averring the work had been done under a special contract/ and. the issue formed was submitted to a jury, who found there was no special contract, and gave a verdict for the value of the complainant’s work, so far as it was unpaid.
It is first insisted, by counsel for appellant, that house-painters are not within the protection .of the lien law, because, it…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Beaudry v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
- Harms v. FitzgeraldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
- Grewar v. AllowayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1877
- Heller v. Millis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1947
- Wood Co. v. Wil. Conf. AcademySuperior Court of Delaware · 1878