Legal Opinion

State v. Summers

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 14, 1991No. Nos. 24967-3-I; 26026-0-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

Appellant Arthur Summers challenges his conviction and sentencing for violation of the Uniform Firearms Act (VUFA). Because his challenge is based upon the claimed invalidity of an earlier conviction for first degree manslaughter, the appellant has also filed a personal restraint petition which has been consolidated with the appeal.1 Because we determine that the burden of proof rule in self-defense cases announced after appellant's 1976 manslaughter conviction should not be retroactively applied, *925we affirm appellant's VUFA conviction below and dismiss his personal restraint petition.

I

Appellan…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SummersWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API