United States v. J. Eisenberg, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Judge
*106This is an appeal from, the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, one judge dissenting, Abstract 59106, sustaining a protest by the importer, appellee here, overruling the collector’s classification of the involved merchandise as “wool rags” under paragraph 1105 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and holding it properly dutiable as “Waste, not specially provided for” under paragraph 1555 of that Act, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52739.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Pearson & EmmottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904