Legal Opinion
Gargano v. Plus One Holdings, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 24, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00735Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 22-cv-00735-DMS-MMP 11 AMBER GARGANO, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL 13 PLUS ONE HOLDINGS, INC., 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for new trial. (ECF No. 101.) A 18 jury trial on Plaintiff’s claims for disability discrimination resulted in a verdict in favor of 19 Defendant, Plus One Holdings, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Plus One”) on all counts. Plaintiff 20 Amber Gargano (“Plaintiff” or “Gargano”) now moves for a new trial arguing that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Harolyn Pavao, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jon Webster Pavao v. John Pagay County of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jeremy Venson v. Lazaro AltamiranoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.