Legal Opinion

International Worsted Mills v. Priestleys, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1922Published

Appeal by the defendant, Priestleys, Limited, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8th day of February, 1922, appointing a referee to hear and determine the issues.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

The complaint consists of forty-eight causes of action, of which three set out in the papers on appeal are typical. The first cause of action is for goods sold and delivered and possibly on an account stated. It is of the same nature as the causes of action set out in action No. 1, decided herewith. (Internal. Worsted Mills v. Priestleys, Ltd., No. 1, 201 App. Div. 547.) The second alleged cause of action seems to be based on the same goods delivered and on the return of the same pieces alleged in the first cause of action, but it is difficult to find any cause of action alleged. It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Hill v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. International Worsted Mills v. Priestleys, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API