Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 5, 1989No. Appeal No. 1560 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Colins,

The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company (P&LE) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) which, inter alia, imposed the responsibility of maintaining Pier “L” and Span “B” of a bridge commonly known as the Mahoning Avenue Viaduct upon P&LE. We affirm.

The instant controversy stems from the reconstruction of a bridge which carries Mahoning Avenue, a state highway, over the Shenango River, the tracks of P&LE and Consolidated Rail Corporation and a right-of-way owned by CSX Transportation, Inc., in the City of New…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. York v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. York v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. East Rockhill Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Greene Township Board of Supervisors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Pgh. & L. Erie Rr v. Pa. PucCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API