Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Colins,
The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company (P&LE) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) which, inter alia, imposed the responsibility of maintaining Pier “L” and Span “B” of a bridge commonly known as the Mahoning Avenue Viaduct upon P&LE. We affirm.
The instant controversy stems from the reconstruction of a bridge which carries Mahoning Avenue, a state highway, over the Shenango River, the tracks of P&LE and Consolidated Rail Corporation and a right-of-way owned by CSX Transportation, Inc., in the City of New…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- York v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- York v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- East Rockhill Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Greene Township Board of Supervisors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Pgh. & L. Erie Rr v. Pa. PucCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.