Legal Opinion
State v. Chevrolet
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 4, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CIOLINO, A.J.S.C.
The facts which form the basis of the municipal court trial and the subsequent appeal are not in dispute. They are as follows: Defendants, Malcolm Konner Chevrolet, Cerami Pontiac Corp. and McDonald’s Corp. all maintain and conduct businesses within the confines of the Borough of Paramus. Each of these defendants had erected 80-foot flag poles, from which they each admittedly flew garrison flags on their properties. *694Defendant, Malcolm Konner Chevrolet, commenced flying the flag on or about October 4, 1983; defendant, Cerami Pontiac, commenced flying the flag in question in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Spence v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Regan v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Quick Chek Food Stores v. Township of SpringfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nationwide v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- State v. CalabriaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997