Legal Opinion

Landesman-Hirschheimer Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 13, 1930No. 5591PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

The two questions hero presented are whether, in the computation of excess prof its taxes for the year 1919, the Commissioner and the Board should have included in the petitioner’s invested capital (1) an item amounting to $25,244.79, carried as a reserve for cash discounts at the beginning of the year 1919, and (2) an item amounting to not less than $81,250, representing the value of intangible property, namely, good will paid in to the petitioner upon its incorporation in 1896, in consideration of stock issued to members of the partnership to whose business…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. LaBelle Iron Works v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Pfleghar Hardware Specialty Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Baker & Taylor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. People v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. WH Hill Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  4. C. M. Hall Lamp Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  5. Strong Pub. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API