Legal Opinion

Matter of Driscoll

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 18, 1978No. 4688, CA 11211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The primary issue in this case is the extent of the authority of the court to remove a conservator of an incompetent person. ORS 126.267 provides:

"The court may remove a conservator for cause, upon notice and hearing, or accept the resignation of a conservator. After his death, resignation or removal, the court may appoint another conservator. A conservator so appointed succeeds to the title and powers of his predecessor.”

The subject of the controversy is John Driscoll, a generally healthy gentleman, (hereinafter father) 90 years of age at the time of trial. Father has three adult children,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kotan v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 110CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Shaw v. ChristoffersenOregon Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grimmett v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Phillips v. JCM Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API