Legal Opinion

17 East 96th Street Owners Corp. v. Madison 96th Street Associate, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 2016No. 2145N 108695/04PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered June 8, 2015, which denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve and file a third amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by denying plaintiff leave to amend its complaint on the eve of trial (see Reuling v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc., 138 AD3d 439 [1st Dept 2016]). There is no evidence in the record to suggest that defendant’s conduct rose to the level of warranting the imposition of punitive damages (see Walker v Sheldon, 10 NY2d 401, 405…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Jenkins v. EtlingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Reuling v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Madison 96th Assoc., LLC v. 17 E. 96th Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API