State v. Becich
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
This is an appeal by the state from an order suppressing evidence. Defendant’s house was searched, pursuant to a search warrant, for two items of stolen property, an antique mantel clock and a portable television set. The search disclosed three large plastic bags of marihuana and defendant was indicted for criminal activity in drugs, ORS 167.207. The trial court suppressed the evidence without making find ings or stating the basis for its ruling. ① We affirm.
It is necessary to an understanding of the issue to set out the relatively complex factual situation from which the problem arose.
A…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Lustig v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Stapleton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. SanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. LowryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Commonwealth v. StorellaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- State v. BohannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.