Albert v. Hudson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Where the owner of an automobile truck hires it, together with his servant who operates it, to another person,' to be paid for at so much an hour, for use in the hauling of gravel for the latter, notwithstanding the work is performed under the direction and supervision of the person to whom the truck and the servant are hired and this person directs the servant as to what gravel to haul, where to *637haul it, and when to haul it, and this is the only supervision and control he exercises over the truck and the servant, and he has no supervision, direction, or control over the servant’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shepard v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Billing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Densby v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Mitchem v. Shearman Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Lee Moor Contracting Co. v. BlantonArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Reliance Insurance v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Ellison v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Harvey v. CW MATTHEWS CONTRACTING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.