Estate of Clark v. Foster & Good Funeral Home, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
In this appeal, the estate of James H. Clark contends that the trial court abused its discretion by disapproving the full amount of fees proposed to be paid for general administration of the estate and legal representation of the personal representative in will contest proceedings and general administration. The appellees, Foster & Good Funeral Home, Inc. and Foster & Good Ambulance Service, Inc. cross-appeal, arguing the trial court erred as a matter of law in ordering payment of attorney fees to both the attorney defending the probated will and personal repre*1100sentative and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bratney v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- In the Matter of Estate of KingseedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hamilton v. HuntingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
- Pleska v. ZakutanskyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Mikesell v. MikesellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Appeal of WickershamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re the Estate of HerbertHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Estate of GoldmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Estate of Clark v. Foster & Good Funeral Home, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- In the Matter of the Supervised Estate of John L. Thompson, Sr.: Sandra Riggs v. Robert Laszynski (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.